meeting looking at charts and data

Why diversification in your portfolio still matters

Rewind to the beginning of 2022, the labor market was strong and inflation had crept to a 40-year high. Expecting it to be transitory, the Federal Reserve Board hiked the fed funds rate 25 basis points, believing that would be enough to keep inflation at bay. Fast forward to present day, the labor market is holding steady, and since that first hike, the Fed added (to date) another 425 basis points to the rate in an effort to stifle inflationary pressures.

It would have been hard to predict such a precipitous turn of events in the market, and bonds reacted the way bonds do when interest rates rise: their prices fell … sharply. In fact, 2022 was intermediate bonds’ worst-performing year since 1926, while long bond losses broke a 250-year record, according to a well-circulated analysis by Edward McQuarrie, professor emeritus at Santa Clara University.

The negative returns in stocks and bonds had investors questioning the wisdom of having a 60/40 portfolio, but it was never about the 60% (i.e., stocks). It was about the suitability of having 40% of an investor’s assets in fixed income in light of the low interest rates and expected returns from fixed income.

Consider that at the beginning of 2022, the yield on the 10-year Treasury was 1.75% and just over a year later, the yield is 3.9%. The rise in yields occurred throughout maturities, with the short end seeing the most increase due to the Fed’s aggressive rate hikes. Meanwhile, corporate debt is yielding even higher as investors are paid a spread over Treasurys to take on additional risk since they are backed by the corporation and not the U.S. government.

Still, bonds offer diversification to stocks, and it is rare to have stocks and bonds deliver negative returns in a given year — happening only two other times: 1931 and 1969. (It is less rare for it to occur on a quarterly basis, with 37 such occasions in 96 years. However, it’s only come to pass nine times since 1990.)

Yields at these levels also dampen the potential blow of further increases to interest rates. The Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (Agg) is now yielding 4% with a duration of 6.3 years, and for the Agg to deliver 0% return, for example, rates would have to increase another 63 basis points. Due to the inverted yield curve, investors can likewise take less interest rate risk by investing in shorter-term bonds which are similarly yielding 4%-5%. A mix of different maturities can lower interest rate risk, while combatting against reinvestment if short-term rates go lower due to potential fed funds rate cuts in the future.

Over the short term, it’s difficult to determine what will happen, especially in view of a potential recession, history tells us it shouldn’t get much worse for bonds. Rather, they should soon be back to what they do best in a portfolio, which is balancing out the typically more volatile stocks.

Whether that means investors should be reviving their 60/40 portfolio or just ensuring they have enough diversification to withstand a recession, they should explore getting creative with their investments.

That doesn’t necessarily mean taking on more risk. It may just be considering areas they haven’t before, including trying out alternatives or finding opportunity in international stocks, which have been garnering more attention from U.S. investors lately. It could also be further diversifying an investor’s holdings with certain types of real estate, like an income-producing investment, or hedging risk with things like gold.

For the majority of investors, the balance of a 60/40 portfolio makes sense, giving investors a consistent return at a moderate risk level. There are exceptions, and the right portfolio combination should be determined after an investor discusses with their financial advisor/planner their risk tolerance, goals, needs, etc.

In this uncertain environment, it is critical investors know what they own, have a strategy within their portfolio and are diversified in their holdings. Most importantly, they should be taking advantage of the income that is there right now.

To learn more, connect with our team.

Baker Tilly Wealth Management, LLC (BTWM) is a registered investment advisor. BTWM does not provide tax or legal advice. BTWM is not an attorney. Estate planning can involve a complex web of tax rules and regulations. Consider consulting a tax or legal professional about your particular circumstances before implementing any tax or legal strategy. The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought.

This information does not constitute investment advice and is not an offer to buy or sell a security. The commentaries provided are opinions of BTWM and are for informational purposes only. While the information is deemed reliable, BTWM cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose and makes no warranties with regard to the results to be obtained from its use, or whether any expressed course of events will actually occur. Securities involve risk and possible loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing in the market involves gains and losses and may not be suitable for all investors. All investments are uninsured and can lose value.

BTWM is controlled by Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and Baker Tilly US, LLP, trading as Baker Tilly, operate under an alternative practice structure and are members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. Baker Tilly US, LLP is a licensed CPA firm that provides assurance services to its clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide tax and consulting services to their clients and are not licensed CPA firms. ©2024 Baker Tilly Wealth Management, LLC

Kelly Baumbach
Executive Managing Director
Jeremy Robert
Managing Director
Finance executive analyzes cash on hand report
Next up

Delaware v. Pennsylvania – The MoneyGram decision favors application of the place of sale rule