Residency changes are often fraught with uncertainty from a tax perspective. States are not known for easily letting go of tax revenue and will often fight hard to keep it. An individual who has been a long-time resident tax filer of one state and in a subsequent year is either a non-resident filer or does not file at all in the former state, is at high risk for audit.
Likewise, states that impose estate taxes are unlikely to accept a post office box in Florida as change in residency.
Whether looking for alternatives to high income tax states like New York and California or high estate tax states like Washington and Massachusetts, it is important to understand there are complexities in establishing a new tax home.
Where you live, and where you die for tax purposes is determined under two principles: statutory residency and domicile.
Residency and domicile overview
Residency
Residency is where you’re physically present other than for a temporary or transitory purpose. As such, domicile and residency locations may not be the same. For this reason and many others, multiple states may claim that you’re a resident under their state statutes.
For example, the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) assumes you’re a resident if you spend nine months of the year in the state. However, spending less than nine months there doesn’t necessarily mean you’re not a resident.
New York and Pennsylvania consider you a statutory resident if you maintain a home and spend at least half the year in the state. Washington state presumes you’re a resident if you maintain a residence for personal use, have a state professional or business license, or claim Washington as a residence for obtaining a hunting or fishing license, among other activities.
Facts and circumstances matter and must be carefully considered in determining whether a taxpayer is a statutory resident.
Statutory residency
Classifying as a statutory resident is generally met by a seemingly objective test, with many states adopting similar parameters. For example, both New York and Pennsylvania state that an individual is a statutory resident if the person spends more than 183 days in the state and has a permanent place of abode. Although superficially objective, many taxpayers run into issues both over what is considered a day and what is considered a permanent place of abode.
Generally speaking, any part of a day spent in a state counts as a day. If an individual were to enter a state and head to their office for work, catch a ballgame or meet a friend for dinner, that’s a day, regardless of the overall time. What if a person merely enters a state to catch a plane? What if they stop for lunch or pick up a traveling companion on the way to the airport? What if instead, the individual enters the state for in-patient medical treatment for a serious illness? Would it matter if the medical treatment was elective, not serious or done as an outpatient? Questions abound and need to be carefully considered when counting days towards a statutory residency test.
Similar to the day count, we can apply a general rule: if a taxpayer has a home that is winterized, has a kitchen, a bathroom and is available for their exclusive year-round use, it is a permanent place of abode. Once again though, a plethora of exceptions and uncertainties exist. What if you have a simple log cabin with no heat or utilities in cold and snowy upstate New York? What if you bought your adult child an apartment of their own? What if you have access to a corporate apartment? Would it matter if the corporate apartment must be reserved on a first-come-first-served basis?
Both in determining days spent in the state and whether a permanent place of abode exists, facts and circumstances matter and must be carefully considered in determining whether a taxpayer is a statutory resident.
Domiciliary status
A long-term resident of a state is typically considered a domiciliary. While a taxpayer may have more than one statutory residence, they can only have one domicile. When considering the tax implications of a move, domiciliary status is generally where many taxpayers get tripped up, particularly because you must abandon your old domicile and concurrently establish a new one. Intent is of utmost importance. Which state does the individual intend on making their permanent home? The old adage, “actions speak louder than words” applies particularly well with domiciliary issues. There is no shortage of taxpayers that “moved” to Florida or Nevada. They changed their voter’s registration, bank account address, vehicle registrations, maybe even formally declared their residency with the state, but their previous lives in their original state remained unchanged.
It is for this reason that many states hone in on intent and often look to certain primary factors such as home, business involvement, time spent in different locations, items near and dear to the taxpayer and family connections.
A state will often look to the nature, use and size of different residences. For example, if a married couple with two young children has a sprawling estate in the suburbs of Philadelphia near the kids’ schools and a nice, but small apartment in Miami Beach, the primary home is obvious. When dealing with a taxpayer that has adult children and evenly splits their year between two similarly sized and similarly valued residences, the differences are more subtle. So, we consider another factor.
If the taxpayer still works, work location is crucial. For example, what about a taxpayer working out of a Seattle office when home, traveling extensively for work and then heading to their home in Jackson Hole, Wyoming when they are able? Again, that makes for an easier finding, Washington certainly appears to be the state of domicile in this category. However, what if the taxpayer is a remote worker with no office or retired? Business involvement then plays less of a role, so we move on.
This category often involves some overlap with a statutory residency test. If an individual has a home in Pennsylvania and by their own admission spends more than 183 days there, they are at least a statutory resident, case closed. Many individuals have multiple residences and time in one location becomes a more important factor. Often, although not rising above a 183 day threshold, more time is clearly spent at one single location when compared to other residences, but some individuals do evenly split their time between different residences, or travel extensively for work or pleasure. In such instances, the time factor might not point to one particular domicile.
Many people have items of high sentimental or economic value, whether an expansive and expensive art collection or important family heirlooms. Taxpayers commonly say, “tell the auditor that I keep everything of value in Florida.” Auditors can and do check on local residences. They tour the house and see what they find. Once again, this category is often obvious. A professionally decorated home with artwork and family photos clearly wins out over a more sparsely decorated home in Florida with bunk beds. As with the other factors, taxpayers often have similarly decorated homes. In such instances, we move on to our final primary factor.
This is often the most personal and intrusive factor. Familial relationships, how often taxpayers see their children or parents and where and with whom they spend holidays is crucial. Perhaps the extended family is all back home in San Francisco and all the holidays are spent there. Maybe holidays are instead all spent in Florida, and family is scattered across the globe. Maybe once again it is an even split between states. If all of the above-mentioned factors end in a tie, then it is more important to consider other factors such as bank accounts, car registrations, voter ID or homestead property tax rebates.
Final thoughts
Each state and each taxpayer is different. Careful consideration must be given to the statutory and regulatory provisions as well as rulings and case law of the states at issue, and equally careful consideration must be given to a taxpayer’s facts and circumstances as they relate to each state. The information detailed above is meant to be a general guide for consideration.
Questions? Connect with our team to learn more.
State residency rules by state
The following chart (effective Dec. 31, 2025) shows the state residency rules by state, as each state has different requirements.
Note: estate tax residency definitions are not always the same as income tax.
| State | Income tax | Resident | Estate or inheritance tax | Domicile analysis (estate tax) |
| Alabama | Taxpayer who is domiciled in the state OR taxpayer maintains a permanent place of abode and spends more than seven months of the tax year in Alabama | N/A | ||
| Alaska | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| Arizona | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Arizona OR taxpayer who spends more than nine months of the tax year in Arizona | N/A | ||
| Arkansas | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Arkansas OR taxpayer who spends more than six months of the tax year in Arkansas | N/A | ||
| California | Taxpayer who is domiciled in California OR present in California for reasons other than a temporary or transitory purpose | N/A | ||
| Colorado | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Colorado OR maintains a permanent place of abode and spends more than six months of the tax year in Colorado | N/A | ||
| Connecticut | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Connecticut OR maintains permanent place of abode and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in Connecticut | Decedent domiciled in Connecticut at death | ||
| Delaware | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Delaware or spends more than 183 days of the tax year in Delaware | N/A | ||
| District of Columbia | Taxpayer who is domiciled in D.C. or lives in D.C. for 183 days or more | Decedent domiciled in D.C. at death | ||
| Florida | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| Georgia | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Georgia OR taxpayer who spends more than 183 days of the tax year in Georgia | N/A | ||
| Hawaii | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Hawaii OR is present in Hawaii for more than 200 days of the tax year | Decedent domiciled in Hawaii at death | ||
| Idaho | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Idaho for the entire tax year OR maintains a place of abode and spends more than 270 days of the year in Idaho | N/A | ||
| Illinois | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Illinois for the entire tax year | Same definition | ||
| Indiana | Taxpayer domiciled in Indiana during the taxable year OR maintains permanent residence and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in Indiana | N/A | ||
| Iowa | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Iowa or maintains a permanent place of abode in Iowa and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in Iowa | N/A | ||
| Kansas | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Kansas | N/A | ||
| Kentucky | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Kentucky OR taxpayer who spends more than 183 days in the state and maintains a place of abode in Kentucky | Same definition | ||
| Louisiana | Taxpayer who is domiciled OR maintains a permanent abode OR spends more than 6 months of the tax year in Louisiana | N/A | ||
| Maine | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Maine OR has a permanent place of abode in Maine and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in Maine | Decedent was a resident in Maine at death | ||
| Maryland | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Maryland OR maintains a place of abode for more than six months of the tax year in Maryland and is present for 183 days or more | Decedent was domiciled in Maryland at death | ||
| Massachusetts | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Massachusetts OR maintains a permanent place of abode in Massachusetts and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in the state | Decedent domiciled in Massachusetts if their permanent and principal home was in Massachusetts at death | ||
| Michigan | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Michigan OR lives in Michigan for at least 183 days of the tax year | N/A | ||
| Minnesota | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Minnesota OR maintains a permanent place of abode and spends at least 183 days in Minnesota during the year | Decedent was domiciled in Minnesota at death | ||
| Mississippi | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Mississippi OR maintains an abode in Mississippi OR exercises the rights of citizenship in Mississippi | N/A | ||
| Missouri | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Missouri OR maintains a permanent place of residence in Missouri and spends more than 183 days in the state | N/A | ||
| Montana | Taxpayer who is domiciled OR maintains a permanent place of abode in Montana | N/A | ||
| Nebraska | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Nebraska or maintains a permanent place of abode in Nebraska, is present in Nebraska and spends at least 183 days in the state | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Nebraska or maintains a permanent place of abode in Nebraska and spends at least 183 days in the state | ||
| Nevada | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| New Hampshire | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| New Jersey | Taxpayer who establishes domicile in New Jersey OR maintains a permanent place of abode in New Jersey and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in New Jersey | Same definition | ||
| New Mexico | Taxpayer who is domiciled in New Mexico for the entire year OR is physically present in New Mexico for 185 days or more during the tax year | N/A | ||
| New York | Taxpayer who is domiciled in New York OR maintains a permanent place of abode in New York and spends 183 days or more in the state | Same definition | ||
| North Carolina | Taxpayer who is domiciled in North Carolina OR lives in North Carolina for more than 183 days | N/A | ||
| North Dakota | Taxpayer who is domiciled in North Dakota OR maintains an abode and spends more than seven months (210 days) of the tax year in North Dakota. | N/A | ||
| Ohio | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Ohio | N/A | ||
| Oklahoma | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Oklahoma | N/A | ||
| Oregon | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Oregon or maintains a permanent place of abode in Oregon and spends more than 200 days of the tax year in the state | Decedent was domiciled in Oregon at death | ||
| Pennsylvania | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Pennsylvania and spends at least 30 days in the state OR spends over 183 days in Pennsylvania | Decedent was domiciled in Pennsylvania at death | ||
| Rhode Island | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Rhode Island OR maintains a permanent place of abode in Rhode Island and spends more than 183 days of the tax year in the state | Decedent was resident in Rhode Island at death | ||
| South Carolina | Taxpayer who is domiciled in South Carolina or has the intention to maintain South Carolina as their permanent home | N/A | ||
| South Dakota | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| Tennessee | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| Texas | N/A - No income or estate tax | N/A | ||
| Utah | Taxpayer is domiciled in Utah OR maintains a place of abode in Utah and spends 183 or more days of the tax year in Utah | N/A | ||
| Vermont | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Vermont OR maintains a permanent home in Vermont and is present in the state for more than 183 days of the tax year | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Vermont or maintains a permanent home in Vermont and is present in the state for more than 183 days of the tax year | ||
| Virginia | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Virginia OR maintains a place of abode for more than 183 days | N/A | ||
| Washington | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Washington OR maintains a permanent place of abode for more than 183 days in the tax year | Decedent was resident in Washington at death | ||
| West Virginia | Taxpayer who is domiciled in West Virginia OR maintains a permanent place of abode and spends more than 183 days in state during the tax year | N/A | ||
| Wisconsin | Taxpayer who is domiciled in Wisconsin | N/A | ||
| Wyoming | N/A - No income or estate tax |
Related sections
The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Tax information, if any, contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties, nor should such information be construed as an opinion upon which any person may rely. The intended recipients of this communication and any attachments are not subject to any limitation on the disclosure of the tax treatment or tax structure of any transaction or matter that is the subject of this communication and any attachments.



