Opportunity Zones 2.0 (OZ) reopens a powerful tool for place-based investment, but only jurisdictions that prepare deliberately will see results. This checklist reflects what public-sector leaders should do now, before the designation window opens.
- Appoint a single OZ 2.0 lead: Designate one office or senior staff member responsible for OZ strategy, coordination and deadlines.
- Create an interagency OZ working group: Include economic development, housing, planning, transportation, workforce and budget/tax staff.
- Brief elected leadership early: Explain what changed in OZ 2.0 (permanence, tighter eligibility, rural incentives, reporting). Clarify tradeoffs and political risks associated with poor zone selection.
- Set a clear economic objective: Decide what OZs are meant to deliver—jobs, housing, rural investment, business growth or some combination.
- Pull the OZ 2.0 eligibility list: Screen census tracts using the new income and poverty thresholds. Confirm no reliance on contiguous tract exceptions (now eliminated).
- Define written zone selection criteria: Balance economic distress with market feasibility, infrastructure access and on-the-ground community readiness.
- Analyze OZ 1.0 performance: Identify which past zones attracted investment and which did not. Avoid repeating ‘no-investment’ zones—tracts that received little or no OZ activity under OZ 1.0.
- Intentionally incorporate a rural strategy: Identify tracts that benefit from enhanced rural OZ incentives. Confirm that rural projects can meet the 50% substantial improvement threshold.
- Plan a transparent public input process: Publish selection criteria, consider local recommendations and document decision-making.
- Inventory investable projects: Include real estate, operating businesses, industrial, logistics or mixed-use sites.
- Prioritize projects with site control: Focus on publicly owned sites, projects with identified development partners or those with a clear land assembly path.
- Preclear major development barriers: Address zoning alignment, environmental conditions, and utility or infrastructure capacity issues.
- Create investor-ready project sheets: Include location and OZ status, proposed use and size, estimated capital stack and available local incentives.
- Map all complementary incentives: Identify state and local tax credits, grants and infrastructure funding sources.
- Evaluate stacking opportunities: Assess compatibility with New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC), Low-income housing tax credits (LIHTC) or workforce housing tools and brownfield or site redevelopment programs.
- Streamline development approvals: Reduce uncertainty in zoning, permitting and entitlements to signal predictability to investors.
- Explicitly integrate rural OZ advantages: Market the 30% basis step-up and highlight reduced improvement requirements.
- Document community priorities: Housing affordability, job access and small business support.
- Meet with local stakeholders early: Engage anchor institutions, nonprofits and residents.
- Set expectations for investors: Encourage local hiring, use of local and small-business suppliers, and mixed-income housing where appropriate.
- Assess displacement risks: Monitor housing supply and coordinate with housing stabilization and tax relief tools.
- Develop a clear OZ 2.0 value proposition: Articulate the community’s place-based assets and how they align with OZ 2.0 rules.
- Create plain-language OZ materials: Explain how OZ 2.0 works, including timelines, holding periods and basic compliance requirements.
- Build relationships with capital providers: Engage Qualified Opportunity Funds, banks, CDFIs and developers.
- Position government as a facilitator: Convene, connect and de-risk—without overpromising returns.
- Understand OZ 2.0 reporting requirements: Anticipate expanded federal reporting obligations and penalties for noncompliance.
- Define success metrics: Jobs created, housing units delivered and businesses launched or expanded.
- Assign data ownership: Determine who collects, validates and reports data.
- Create a feedback loop: Inform zone strategy and project focus throughout each 10-year designation cycle.
- Integrate OZs into the 10-year economic strategy: Treat OZs as permanent infrastructure, not a short-term incentive.
- Document decisions and outcomes: Prepare institutional knowledge for the next redesignation cycle.
- Assess staffing and capacity: Ensure long-term program management is realistic and resourced.
The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Tax information, if any, contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties, nor should such information be construed as an opinion upon which any person may rely. The intended recipients of this communication and any attachments are not subject to any limitation on the disclosure of the tax treatment or tax structure of any transaction or matter that is the subject of this communication and any attachments.


