Baker Tilly

Loading...

Subscribe to newsletters
About Us
Careers
Client Portals
Pay Invoice
Locations
Industries
Services
Professionals
Legal & Privacy
CCPA Privacy
Contact Us
Request a Proposal

© 2024-2026 Baker Tilly US, LLP / Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP

Baker Tilly US, LLP and Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide professional services through an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable laws, regulations and professional standards. Baker Tilly US, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide tax and business advisory services to their clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and Baker Tilly US, LLP are independent members of Baker Tilly International. Baker Tilly International Limited is an English company. Baker Tilly International provides no professional services to clients. Each member firm is a separate and independent legal entity and each describes itself as such. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and Baker Tilly US, LLP are not Baker Tilly International’s agent and do not have the authority to bind Baker Tilly International or act on Baker Tilly International’s behalf. None of Baker Tilly International, Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP, Baker Tilly US, LLP, nor any of the other member firms of Baker Tilly International has any liability for each other’s acts or omissions. The name Baker Tilly and its associated logo is used under license from Baker Tilly International Limited.

Article

The new lease accounting standard includes a significant change for stakeholders in transportation and logistics

March 1, 2017 · Authored by Tanya Nelson

Subscribe to newsletters

Share

Related sections

  • Assurance
  • Lease Accounting (ASC 842 and GASB 87)

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, Leases, which provides new lease accounting standards that change the accounting for leasing arrangements.

The new leasing standard is required to be adopted in 2019 for calendar year-end public business entities and the following fiscal year for all other entities. Early adoption is permitted at any time, which might be desirable for some.

Significant impact on transportation and logistics

The new standard primarily changes accounting guidance for lessees to now require operating lease assets and lease liabilities to be recorded on the balance sheet, with an accounting policy option to exclude those leases with a maximum lease term of 12 months or less from balance sheet recognition. This significantly differs from legacy accounting for operating leases, under which they were viewed as executory contracts, often referred to as “off-balance-sheet.”

In its 2005 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission report, SEC staff estimated that there were approximately $1.25 trillion in off-balance-sheet operating lease obligations. These weren’t recognized on issuer balance sheets but were instead disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. Adjusted for inflation, the amount was about $1.54 trillion in 2016.

Here are a couple of examples that show how the new standard will significantly impact some companies in the transportation and logistics industry.

UPS Inc.

UPS, the nation’s largest for-hire carrier, reported the following in its 10-Q filed for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016: “This new guidance requires modified retrospective application and becomes effective for us in the first quarter of 2019, but early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating this update to determine the full impact of its adoption on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures. We expect material changes to our consolidated financial position.”

There will indeed be material changes because UPS' operating leases, which include aircraft, facilities, land, equipment, and vehicles, amounted to $1.26 billion in future contractual obligations as of Dec. 31, 2015, as reported in the company’s 10-K filed for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.

Tanya Nelson profile photo

Tanya Nelson

Principal

Related sections

  • Assurance
  • Lease Accounting (ASC 842 and GASB 87)
Manager reviewing logistics for a warehouse

Next up

Mexico offers intriguing opportunities for American brands looking for new markets

Discover more

The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Tax information, if any, contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties, nor should such information be construed as an opinion upon which any person may rely. The intended recipients of this communication and any attachments are not subject to any limitation on the disclosure of the tax treatment or tax structure of any transaction or matter that is the subject of this communication and any attachments.

FedEx Corp.

FedEx, the nation’s second largest for-hire carrier, also recognized in its 10-Q filed for the quarter ended Nov. 30, 2016, that the lease liability and related right-of-use asset will significantly impact its balance sheet.

At Nov. 30, 2016, while its future minimum lease payments under capital leases were immaterial, those under noncancelable operating leases — mainly aircraft and facilities — amounted to $17.8 billion, which is about 35% of the company’s annual fiscal-year 2016 revenue.

The company also disclosed that in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), these future contractual payments aren’t recorded in its balance sheet, and the majority of these leases will be required to be recognized at the present value on the balance sheet as a liability with an offsetting right-to-use asset under the new lease accounting rules. FedEx has indicated that credit rating agencies routinely use information concerning minimum lease payments required for FedEx’s operating leases to calculate the company’s debt capacity.

Evaluate your leases

It’s important to evaluate your leases, assess the operational impacts, determine potential tax consequences, and assess whether there are potentially any benefits of early adoption that may apply to your company.

It isn’t always straightforward. The new standard defines a lease as “a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.”  To meet this definition, the contract may identify the specific property, plant, or equipment either explicitly or implicitly.

This means that there’s some judgment that’s necessary when determining if two criteria — an identified asset and customer control — are included in the contract. When these two criteria are combined with the transfer of consideration, the new standard requires the arrangement to be accounted for as a lease. Below, we’ll take a look at a few common examples of areas where judgment is required.

Identified asset example

Transportation contracts may explicitly or implicitly specify the exact vessel, rail car, or truck to be used. For example, a contract would implicitly identify the equipment in the contract when the owner of the asset has no practical alternative equipment that can be used to fulfill the agreement, even if the contract doesn’t explicitly state which specific piece of equipment will be provided.

In this scenario, the contract would be (or contain) a lease if the contract met the other criteria in the definition of a lease; that is, the customer can control the use of the transportation equipment and is required to transfer consideration to the supplier of the equipment, even though the specific piece of equipment isn’t explicitly listed in the contract.

Customer control example

Company A enters into a contract for the exclusive use of a cargo ship for a three-year period for a fee. The supplier, Company B, is required to provide an explicitly identified ship and doesn’t have substitution rights to use another ship. Company B operates and maintains the ship; however, Company A decides what cargo will be transported on the ship operated by Company B as well as the dates and cities the ship will sail to for the load and off-load of the cargo.

In this scenario, the contract contains a lease as all of the lease criteria are met:

  • There’s an identified asset.
  • Company A has the right to control the ship through exclusive use over the three-year period as well as the right to direct the ship — which cargo will be carried, where the ship will arrive, and when.
  • Company A is obligated to pay Company B a fee for the use of the ship.

In contrast, changing some small details within a contract could result in a contract no longer being considered a lease.

Assume the same facts above with the exception that the contract specifies the cargo that will be transported and the location and dates Company B is expected to have the ship at for the loading and off-loading of Company A’s cargo. While Company A doesn’t have the exclusive use of the cargo ship or rights to control the use of it in this scenario, the ship is still explicitly specified. Since Company A doesn’t have any further decision-making rights as to the use of the ship during the contract term, it’s determined to not have control of the specified asset and the arrangement is therefore not a lease.

New normal

Today, as incredible momentum takes place across the transportation industry — including groundbreaking automated vehicle technology, electric vehicles, and charging infrastructure, renewable diesel and natural gas technologies, and roll-out of EPA Phase two regulations — new capital investments and leasing will be an inevitable part of staying in the game.

Green Fleet Systems, which serves various business sectors that use the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles in California, is one of the leaders in embracing this new normal. They’re committed to being one of the first so-called green trucking companies operating clean burning, environmentally friendly fuel trucks.

BNSF Railway and Daylight Transport are other examples of companies that embrace new technology. They both operate zero-emissions, electric-powered, heavy-duty vehicles — BNSF Railway at its intermodal rail yards in the California cities of San Bernardino and Commerce and Daylight Transport out of its new truck freight transfer facility in Fontana.

With these historical investments into new technology and infrastructure, there’s a case to be made that users of financial statements can more easily compare companies that own their productive assets with those that lease their productive assets as a result of the new lease accounting guidance. This is because operating lease obligations will no longer be left off balance sheets.

Have questions? Baker Tilly can help.

Contact a specialist