HR 415: Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2015

2015 continues to bring attention to corporate inversions, which dominated headlines last year. January saw the reintroduction of the Stop Corporate Inversions Act (H.R. 415) in the House by Sander Levin and Lloyd Doggett, while a companion bill was cosponsored in the Senate by Dick Durbin and Jack Reed. The House bill seeks to modify the definition of inverted domestic corporations under section 7874, defining them as any entity that:

  1. acquires, after May 8, 2014, substantially all of the properties of a US corporation or assets of a US partnership;
  2. after the acquisition, more than 50 percent of the stock is held by former shareholders of the US corporation, or the management and control of the expanded affiliated group, including the US entity, occurs primarily in the US and the expanded affiliate group has significant US business activities; and
  3. does not have substantial business activities in the foreign jurisdiction where the US entity is relocating.

In addition, the revised Levin and Doggett bill sets a new threshold for an expanded affiliate group to be treated as a US corporation. More specifically, aside from the substantial activities of the executive officers and senior management, the proposal defines significant domestic business activities by analyzing whether 25 percent or more of employees, sales, income, or assets are derived in the US. In some respects, the bill seems slightly more aggressive than Notice 2014-52 in its effort of tackling the inversion phenomenon.

View Treasury seeks to put an end to corporate inversions >

For more information on this topic, or to learn how Baker Tilly tax specialists can help, contact our team.

The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Tax information, if any, contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties, nor should such information be construed as an opinion upon which any person may rely.  The intended recipients of this communication and any attachments are not subject to any limitation on the disclosure of the tax treatment or tax structure of any transaction or matter that is the subject of this communication and any attachments.