This is the second blog in our series exploring outcome KPIs for not-for-profits. In our previous article, we wrote about how today’s not-for-profits need to track the outputs and outcomes of their efforts – the actual impact of their mission in action. Why? To build and maintain the confidence of funding sources that expect transparency and accountability like never before.
Before we address how to measure and track not-for-profit outcomes in later posts, we need to debunk a common myth: That most not-for-profits understand their performance already. Rather, most organizations make some attempt to understand it but come up shorter than they realize.
Take a church, for example. It seems natural to measure performance based on the weekly attendance or the level of donations. But churches don’t just aspire to fill seats or raise money – they have loftier ambitions to change lives in deep, meaningful ways. Just because a church packs the pews on a Sunday doesn’t mean it reaches everyone in the audience. Most other not-for-profits have this same problem: where the appearance of success obscures the actual performance.
Why does this happen? Blame the way we analyze information. We claim to interpret the facts objectively and consistently, but human bias still creeps in – especially when it comes to identifying and quantifying our own successes ... or lack thereof.
When not-for-profits overestimate their success or overlook their shortcomings, it’s usually because of three common causes. Do these look familiar?
It’s time to replace assumptions about not-for-profit performance with hard data. Only once a not-for-profit knows what its impact really looks like can it set about expanding and improving on things. Baker Tilly can help you make that assessment.